Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
Comments
15 responses to “1WineDude TV Episode 26: Don’t Go Hatin’ On Wine Scores”
Good points and good lighting Joe
Thanks, Frank.
I'm never gonna live the lighting thing down, am I?
:)
Last comment about the lighting. The point system will die a natural death, as consumers and the trade no longer need it as a crutch. Maybe tasting notes and systems will evolve that will become the new reality.
C'mon, Frank, I need you to keep me honest about the lighting! :)
Regarding teh scores and a new reality – I wouldn't mind scores and other rating systems hanging around, provided they are used with more education by both consumers and retailers. Cheers!
No way Frank. Scores are shorthand and they are used in every field of evaluation.
I completely agree. It is NOT the system's fault! The system obviously works or else it wouldn't be the dominant wine evaluation tool. I agree that the system is not perfect, but it is probably the single most influential innovation in the wine industry, ever. The problem is with how this system is used or manipulated. People often forget that there is actual interesting wine inside those expensive glass bottles and not just liquid numbers!
As a corollary, (I posted this on Tom Wark's most recent post) Are Parker's (and the other big critics') scores actually starting to become a disservice to the wine consumer? One thing that is already taking place and I would bet will increase is that regions on Parker's "it" (ahem, Bordeaux) list wait to price their wines until he has had the chance to evaluate and rate them accordingly. If this becomes more commonplace, perhaps Parker, et al. are turning into more of a producers' advocates rather than a consumer advocates. Tom makes a good counter argument about how producers (and I would add retailers/wholesalers) are capitalizing on Parker's popularity and raising their prices according to what the market will withstand, and I agree. However, could critics demand that (or simply just wait until) prices be established before evaluating a wine? Would this be a more consumer friendly approach?
CWP – "not just liquid numbers" – EXACTLY!
Interesting thought about waiting for prices – not sure it would ever stick, but then when Parker retires it's unlikely anyone will ever have that much influence again so we may indeed see prices get set irrespective of ratings.
Cheers!
Nice Post, Joe. Couldn't agree with you more. Keep up the good effort.
BTW: Love the lights. Don't ever change, man. As a matter of fact, I promise to keep watching till you upgrade your lights to some kinda fancy-pants, nihon-techie, 10,000 kw, LED infused LCD…EFG…HIJK stuff. 'Cause that's when I'll know you've sold out and stopped doing it for the love of the game.
Joe, I think that the point system served a postive purpose as it helped separate money from the pockets of people who very understandably lacked intermdiate knowledge about wine but had the inclination and means to try new things. Hey 9-5 and two kids takes away from my ability to read up on wine, and I'm into it! The point system was the de facto VIP club membership card that gets you by the red velvet rope guarding the wines beyond the 9.99$ rack.
As for your comment point that the point system is responsible for weeding out overpriced wines, I think that international competition and crowd sourced opinion are bigger contributors.
By the way I rate your white monkey 92. It was soft with realitic fur, the battery acid was well balanced should be well suited for cellaring.
Thanks, Steve.
You know, I'm re-reading my friend Elin McCoy's book Emperor of Wine and it's striking me the reasons that Bob Parker had for coming up with the 100 point system are no longer as pressing/relevant as they were back then in the late 70s / early 80s. So I think your comment about competition is apt, but more for recent decades.
Oh – and the monkey thanks you! :)
Folks – I know there's been some chatter in the blog-o-world on the fact that I and a few other wine bloggers have brought up the topic of the points system again, and the resultant inevitable question "can't we ever talk about anything else?" etc., etc., etc.
Those people have a point but it's not one that's pertinent to these articles on 1WD.
I say that for 2 reasons:
1) I'm NOT talking about the point system or judging as good/bad/indifferent. I am talking about the fact that the point system is getting abused and it's having real negative impacts on real people trying to make and sell wine.
2) Wednesdays on 1WD are reserved for my Going Pro series where I discuss the industry and my foray into it as I "go pro" as a wine blogger in 2011. Wine rating systems are totally fair game in that context.
So I suppose what I am saying to those folks is that if you want to bemoan me railing against the 100 point system, then please at least pay attention and read the blog and reserve that criticism for when I actually do, in fact, rail against the 10 point system. :-)
Just remember that not all retailers rely on scores. I'm speaking as one of them. If you trust your local store and they are good at helping to develop YOUR palate, they shouldn't have to rely on scores. Just sayin. Great work Joe!
Amen to that, Vinoguru!
Trusting a retailer is really important. When I first started drinking wine, I relied on retailer shelf notes a lot, but then discovered in many stores – even in pretty good wine stores – they sometimes were a device to sell aging wines meant for early consumption. The Parker, WS, etc., ratings have their limitations, but over time you can get a sense of what the accompanying descriptions mean in terms of what you might want to try, regardless of whether the number is a 79 or a 92.
Thanks WD – as I like to say, the most important wine critic in the world is the person in the wine store!