’s Top 100 Most Influential People in the U.S. Wine Industry 2013 (And How Long Will No. 1 Stay No. 1?)

Vinted on February 21, 2013 binned in wine news

It’s that time of year, again.

Last year, Michael Cervin (with whom I later toured the wine scene in Crete) from stirred up a minor sh*tstorm when he published the inaugural version of his list of the Top 100 Most Influential People in the U.S. Wine Industry.

We love lists, and we hate them. Hence the ensuing sh*storm: why was so-and-so left off? how could they place what’s-his-name so high up on the list? are these guys just attention-grabbing?… etc. My takeaway last year was that the list was “good for a pulse check, probably bad for anything more substantial than that.” I’m pretty much of the same mindset regarding the recently-published 2013 version of the list.

According to, they don’t really have a strong agenda in compiling this list of influencers:

“Does influential mean people who move markets, impact consumers, inspire winemakers, form policy, and create debate? Yes… We merely define the Top 100 people, from winemakers to law makers, bankers to bloggers, and sommeliers to celebrities who influence wine; how it is made, marketed, perceived, sold, shipped, purchased, shared and consumed.”

Over the last year, not a lot of shuffling took place in the top 20 (I swapped places with Eric Asimov, which puts him ahead of me and therefore rights at least one wrong from the 2012 version!) – I’m not sure if that means that the wine biz in the U.S. is pretty stagnant from an influencer perspective, but the advent of the list is a god excuse for us to take a pulse of the U.S. wine biz in general…

Just as was the case last year, there are (in my eyes, anyway) some glaring omissions, as well as some odd placements in the 80s and 90s of folks who probably should be in the 20s or 30s (page through the list on the website, and you will immediately see what I’m talking about).

Some people will be happy to see people like me ranked highly on this list, while it will drive some others bonkers, but there’s nothing much I can do about either scenario, except drink some wine (and, as you know, I was gonna go ahead and do that anyway!). At the end of the day, I’m just really grateful to be doing what I’m doing. And while you’re reading this, I’ll be playing the role of Team USA at the 2013 Argentina Wine Awards in Mendoza, with probably little time to argue about the various positions on the list in between sipping and spitting a few hundred Malbecs (hence the break from the normal Thursday wine review – sorry, probably should’ve mentioned that earlier… whoops!). There has been a fairly robust discussion going on about the list over at Tom Wark’s blog (with Michael Cervin chiming in); the comments section there should give you a large Burgundy-style glass full of both measured thoughts and outright snark. To those who’ve supported me over the years here and have offered me congrats when mentions like these lists happen, you’ve got my heartfelt thanks (but you already know that!); to those who are pissed off whenever my name gets mentioned publicly: sorry, but I’m not planning on going anywhere anytime soon, lists or no lists (if it’s any consolation, I can offer you a crap-ton of suggestions if you need a glass of wine to cope :-).

I’ll leave you with these three thoughts about the 2013 list:

1) At this point, while people in the U.S. wine biz could be forgiven for not expecting an on-line influencer to be within the top 20 names of such a list (I’m still shocked, frankly), if they are also surprised to have online influencers on the list altogether then they’ve just not been paying attention to their business over the last five years (and might have gotten their heads lodged firmly into a place that would require a belly-button window to provide visual input from the outside world). Having said that, the big question I have walking away from this year’s list is why aren’t there **more** on-line media peeps on it? It suggests that the wine biz doesn’t give enough of its attention to on-line media (and guess what – it doesn’t!).

2) Numero Uno still belongs to Robert Parker – but for how long? Everyone in the know agrees that the influence of the number one influencer on the list – Robert Parker – is on the wane. Yet, like IBM, his stock can lose value for years before anyone else could challenge his top spot. This is despite the fact that most wine consumers have never heard of him, and that he’s arguably wielding more influence in Asia than in the U.S. Personally, I don’t think we will ever see a recreation of the perfect storm of factors that birthed Parker’s influence – wine criticism is already to democratized and fragmented for that. Who will take that number one spot in the likely-not-too-distant future? I doubt it will be anyone from the Wine Advocate staff under Parker, and I hope it’s someone who actually interacts regularly with consumers (in that vein, it’s very interesting to see Costco’s Annette Alvares-Peters in the number two spot on this list). The lack of clarity and dominance that is set to define the future of wine biz influence is, to me, quite exciting – but I might just be weird…

3) I feel privileged in that of the Top 100 names of U.S. wine biz influencers, I personally know and/or have hung out with and/or count as friends and/or have interviewed over a third of them. And a good many of that third-and-a-bit are just fantastic f*cking people: generous, knowledgeable, fun, friendly, honest and insightful. Yeah, there are a few bad apples, but if there weren’t then it would have to be a list of robots, not vino-imbibing humans. All in all, that’s a sign, I think, of what a true blessing it is just to be in this business (and even more of a blessing to be counted among the ranks of people like that).

Here’s to blessings, people!






  • gabe

    having been lucky enough to receive some positive reviews from several media outlets, my experience would lead me to believe that the Wine Spectator is wielding more influence over the American market than the Wine Advocate. Not sure if that means Marvin Shanken is more influential than Robert Parker, but their respective publications seem to be moving in opposite directions

    • 1WineDude

      Thanks, Gabe. Curious to hear more about that…

      • gabe

        just one persons opinion I guess. I was always skeptical of critics as a wine buyer; but being on the other side, you get a new appreciation of how small wineries benefit from good reviews – shipping out a couple extra pallets, picking up a new out-of-state distributor, or even just a congratulations from a friend. Its really forced me to re-think my opinion about wine scores.

        Anyhow, the winery where I work has been reviewed a few times lately, including a great piece you wrote about our Bon Sauvage tasting "authentic". That was one of my favorite reviews, and not just because you talked about me :-) I like that you "got" our wines and explained what we were doing. Dr Vino wrote about a friend of mine, and he picked up distributors in two new states. So the influence of bloggers is real. But Wine Spectator did an Oregon issue for February, and the effects are resonating across the valley, with all sorts of wineries picking up new distributors, and distributors calling from all over the country for more wine.

        I don't know what's happening with the WIne Advocate shakeup, and it is possible that Robert Parker emerges more popular than ever. But in the meantime, I have to admit that I was impressed by the influence of the Wine Spectator. So they get my vote for #1

        • 1WineDude

          Thanks, Gabe. It would be tough to deny their influence in terms of buying power, I think, with distributors and importers, etc.

        • Dana Estep

          Gabe – unfortunately it doesn't appear your good reviews have turned into increased interest from the great state of PA. Working on a trip to Portland for Memorial Day weekend. Hope to squeeze in a visit to the winery if it can be fit into our schedule and yours. Dana

          • gabe

            We actually have gotten a little interest from Pennsylvania. The real problem is that they only order one wine at a time, and when it sells out it sells out. In other states, we have distributors that order wines on a regular basis. We have great distribution in New York and Mass, but until the law changes, PA will be a "get it while you can" state. Fortunately, our Spectator review did move the needle in PA, and we recently sent them a couple samples.
            As for Memorial Day weekend, that is actually a great weekend to go tasting in the Willamette Valley. Almost every winery has an event that weekend, including ours. Our newest cellar worker is a former professional chef, and if the weather is nice we will give horse tours of the vineyard. I hope you can make it out, it would be fun to meet you. If you have any questions, you can email me : gabe at illahevineyards dot com.

            • Dana Estep

              thanks Gabe I'll definitely be in touch if we get our trip organized and are able to get down to Illahe.

  • bluepastures

    Paul Draper, Terry Thiese, Eric Solomon, and Alice Feiring are all infinitely more important than you, my man.

    • 1WineDude

      Blue – and probably better looking as well…

The Fine Print

This site is licensed under Creative Commons. Content may be used for non-commercial use only; no modifications allowed; attribution required in the form of a statement "originally published by 1WineDude" with a link back to the original posting.

Play nice! Code of Ethics and Privacy.

Contact: joe (at) 1winedude (dot) com





Sign up, lushes!

Enter your email address to subscribe and get all the good stuff via email.

Join 36,826 other subscribers