You Can Keep Your Varietal and Shove It Up Your Variety
I am giving up on what has become a totally fruitless quest ending in a miasma of heartbreak and despair; I hereby renounce my Sisyphusian efforts, and will no longer roll this impossibly heavy boulder of writing wisdom up the mountain of populist adversity, only to have it come heaving down to crush the vulnerable bones of my hopes time and time again.
Not that I feel overly dramatic about it or anything.
What is the heart of this painful linguistic matter? The brilliant and terrible rays of sunlight on the wax wings of my personal flight of Icarus?
It’s the rampant misuse of the word varietal.
To quote Inigo Montoya, “Joo keep using daht word. I donah tink it means what joo tink it means…”
I have seen and heard this term misused by winemakers, public relation professionals, journalists, bloggers, those who pen the copy on the back of wine labels (that one is particularly annoying), book authors – you name it.
And its effect on me is not unlike the sound of linguistic fingernails being raked across the chalkboard of my wine-writing soul. It’s almost as bad as confusing contractions (e.g., “its” vs. “it’s”). Almost. So it’s not the worst writing sin I’ve seen in the wine world. But it’s damn close.
I give up trying to convince everyone to use the words variety and varietal properly.
From now on, just do whatever the hell you want.
GO AHEAD.
Even though it doesn’t mean the same as “variety…”
Even though its [<-- Editor’s Note: correct use without contraction] primary definition is as an adjective, not a noun (unless it’s [<—Editor’s Note: Ah-hah!] being used to represent a wine made primarily from one grape variety)…
Even though you could easily run a define:varietal search in Google and get this in return…:
adj.
Of, indicating, or characterizing a variety, especially a biological variety.
n.
A wine made principally from one variety of grape and carrying the name of that grape.
Just go ahead an use varietal any damn way that you want. See if I care. I give up, I tell ya!
Ok. I’m exhausted now. I’m sorry I got all serious on you, but at least now you know how I feel, right dear?
I think I need a drink.
Maybe I’ll go for a varietal wine that is made from a single grape variety like Cabernet Sauvignon. You know, one that really displays the typical varietal characteristics of the variety… ah, f*ck it…!
Cheers!
Other stuff you might dig:
- 2009’s Most Engaging Wine Blogs and Our Utter Lack of Diversity
- Not-Quite-Readers’ Choice: Top 10 1WineDude Articles of 2009
- Does the World Need Another Wine Intro Book? (Book Review: Drink This)
- Meet The New Wine Expert: You!
Tags: 1winedude, varietal, variety, wine writing
February 16th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
I'm glad you're giving up this quest. To me, the grammar used to describe wine matters just about as much as the color of the font on the bottle. Please focus more on the finished product and let the language-impared enjoy it just the same.
February 16th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Just crank up some Rush and this will soon be a distant memory.
February 16th, 2010 at 10:17 am
[...] 1 Wine Dude lets his inner grammar nerd run free: [...]
February 16th, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Joe, after reading that, I'm even more confused as to which usage is appropriate for each condition.
February 16th, 2010 at 3:56 pm
It's just occurred to me that maybe I just have issues… :-)
February 16th, 2010 at 5:18 pm
Were you by chance the caller in this YouTube video? :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-4I-KFqgiA
February 16th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
You writed this thing good. It iz bangin'
You are a a blogger of the good varietal.
Brawndo. Mondo good.
February 16th, 2010 at 7:08 pm
With a bit of minor mental gymnastics, there's a way to wrap your head around this. It doesn't happen often in English, but there are times when the adjective comes after the noun: "knight errant", "Attorney General". Thus, "grape varietal" could be grammatically correct with grape as the noun and varietal used in its traditional form as the adjective.
Of course, this battle was lost a hundred years ago when "plastic" became a noun. :)
February 16th, 2010 at 8:08 pm
Thanks, all – I especially like the "knight errant" explanation!
February 16th, 2010 at 8:21 pm
I gave up on correcting people that call all sparkling wine "Champagne". It used to drive me crazy but I guess its kinda like telling people they can't say "Kleenex" but must use the proper "facial tissue"
February 16th, 2010 at 8:33 pm
I don't mind if folks use varietal instead of variety. It just indicates that they know wine but English isn't their first language. Or that they just don't care. Language is a constantly morphing beast, as it should be, and if you can't beat 'em, f**k 'em.
February 16th, 2010 at 9:53 pm
I just love the varietal of subjects covered on this blog!
February 17th, 2010 at 12:00 am
Sure, guys – kick me while I'm down… ;-)
February 17th, 2010 at 12:40 am
It JUST occurred to you?!
February 17th, 2010 at 2:10 am
Benito's errant. And I just can't let it slide that mdexter managed to misspell "impa[i]red" in his "don't worry about it" response. This has killed me for ages, so I'm glad to know I'm in good company.
February 16th, 2010 at 9:30 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by wewuvwine: We’ll drink to that! ‘You Can Keep Your Varietal and Shove It Up Your Variety’ – http://bit.ly/b6zgzH #wine…
February 17th, 2010 at 4:30 am
Ah geez, I thought I knew the appropriate use of the word "varietal," but now I'm not so sure. I read, re-read, and re-read again the def above and I still don't know if I know the approproiate use of the word! : ) Oh well. Better pour myself another glass of this grape-y red stuff and think about it.
February 17th, 2010 at 4:58 pm
:-P
February 17th, 2010 at 4:58 pm
So I've managed to make this *worse*? Oh no!
February 18th, 2010 at 2:11 am
I feel compelled to point out that Karen MacNeil misused the word varietal today during our Wine Writers Symposium blind tasting session on offbeat CA reds.
So, if I hadn't abandoned all hope of this quest before today, my hopes for showing the world the path of righteousness on this topic have been officially and totally shattered now.
:)
February 18th, 2010 at 5:18 am
Sounds like you need to forget this endeavor, open a bottle (varietal of your choice) and watch Princess Bride…I mean it! ;)
February 18th, 2010 at 6:21 am
"Anybody want a peanut?"
Sorry… couldn't resist… I'm addicted to movie quotes…
February 18th, 2010 at 3:42 pm
You can always help me with my quest to obliterate the phrases "really unique" and "very Historic" from the english language.
In the mena time (and feeling a kinship with you) I would like to suggest "Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation" by Lynne Truss
http://www.amazon.com/Eats-Shoots-Leaves-Toleranc...
February 18th, 2010 at 5:56 pm
I had to give up on this one too. I kept thinking I was doing people a service, but I could tell by their reactions that they just thought I was being a douche bag.
February 18th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
My pet peeve is when people use the word "literally" immediately before describing something figurative. Like when sports announcers say something like, "LaDainian Tomlinson literally stopped on a dime." Oh really? What the hell was a dime doing sitting at the 40 yard line of a football field?
February 18th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
I really need to read that book (would make a great birthday gift for me, btw… which is coming up in March… :-)
February 18th, 2010 at 6:28 pm
HA!!! Thanks for giving me another thing that I will now notice every time that it happens…
February 18th, 2010 at 9:34 pm
I am hanging my head in shame. I am a guilty blogger in this regard as I don't always know when varietal ends and variety begins, I do however know that an It's It is a tasty ice cream delight.
February 20th, 2010 at 4:33 pm
I totally love it! I am a varietal/variety adjective/noun distinction kind of girl! …
February 20th, 2010 at 5:00 pm
Dude, really? Journalism, grammar and semantics…really? Although, I'm now looking forward to you future post re.: its-it's; effect-affect; and the riveting your-you're. Also, please note that I've updated my will this AM, and that on my transition to, well, whatever is next you will receiving, from my writer's bookshelf, 'The Gregg Reference Manual,' 'The Wine Business Monthly Writer's Style Guide' and the dogeared 'Language in Thought and Action.' So, with that behind us, just when are we getting our Dude back? You know, The Dude whose passion isn't based on grammar, but on his journey into the world of wine. The one that was so well described by the Cohen Brother's: "The Dude Abides. I don't know about you, but I take comfort in that. It's good knowin' he's out there, The Dude, takin' her easy for all us sinners."
Cheers,
Cork
February 20th, 2010 at 5:14 pm
Oh, crikey..two quick but necessary edits to my comment post… your instead of you..Coen Brother's instead of Cohen Brothers..no more post wine party, pre-coffeee IV commenting.. Captain Judy, my high school English teacher is rolling over in his grave at the moment…..
February 20th, 2010 at 1:15 pm
This drives me crazy too, though I have to say I was a serious offender before reading a piece in Wines & Vines on the matter. Then I went back and changed everything I’d ever written! I say carry on Joe – people don’t deserve to be ignorant! Cheers!
February 20th, 2010 at 7:20 pm
I find myself tongue-tied now when I talk about variety/varietal. I think it makes me look more like an idiot probably. :)
February 20th, 2010 at 4:48 pm
Funnily enough, I was "correcting" Janet Myers (Mt. Vedeer and Franciscan wine director) on this yesterday… we had a good laugh over it.
February 21st, 2010 at 1:52 pm
Thanks, all! Don't feel dumb about this – smarter people than me (ok, well, that's a lot of people…) are making this mistake!
Also – I'll be back soon! On my way to the Right Coast now so I can get back to bloggin' and share my twisted thoughts on this Napa jaunt…
Cheers!
February 21st, 2010 at 6:17 pm
Your use of Inigo Montoya in this post is beyond impressive.
February 22nd, 2010 at 11:26 am
Mary Ewing-Mulligan MW is top notch in the wine-smarties department. The real "Wine for Dummies" book is probably the best single resource for anyone starting out in wine. I did not know there was a pocket version of the same, but since it does exist, you should buy it over other bullshit books.
February 22nd, 2010 at 12:45 pm
I'm guessing you wanted to post this comment on the article about the $1 pocket book, bro. Of course, I agree with you that she is badass – I've never met her, though.
February 22nd, 2010 at 12:46 pm
Lemme explain… no, is no time… lemme sum up!
April 25th, 2010 at 5:01 am
[...] You Can Keep Your Varietal and Shove It Up Your Variety | 1 Wine Dude [...]
May 7th, 2010 at 4:25 am
[...] You Can Keep Your Varietal and Shove It Up Your Variety | 1 Wine Dude [...]