1 Wine Dude

A Serious Wine Blog For the Not-So-Serious Drinker

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • New? Start Here!
    • PR & Samples
    • Press & What-Have-You
  • Wine
    • by badge
      • crowd pleaser
      • elegant
      • kick-ass
      • overachiever
      • sexy
    • Full Reviews
    • Mini-Reviews
  • Stalk
    • Follow me on News Break!
    • facebook
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • pinterest
    • twitter
    • YouTube
  • Sign Up
  • Books
  • Services
  • Contact
Menu
1 Wine Dude

The Last Word on Wine Media Ethics3 min read

Posted on May 19, 2009May 27, 2009 by 1WineDude

in commentary

Hey, wanna talk about ethics in wine media?

Chances are, if you’re in wine media, the answer is “Yes!  Please!”

If you’re not in wine media, I’m willing to bet the answer is “Huh?  Who gives a sh*t?!??”  I suspect that the population breakdown looks something like this:

So, when I title this “Last Word…,” I don’t mean it’s the final statement to end all navel-gazing debates when it comes to the ethics of covering the wine world.  I just mean that it’s the last time I’m going to touch the topic.

I do have a vested interest in all of this ethics-debating, mind you.  I was myself the target of an ethical stone or two thrown last year, and there’s been some damn fine writing lately on what constitutes ethical behavior in the world of wine coverage.  Also, in case you haven’t noticed, I do write about wine.  Sometimes.  When I’m not drinking it, I mean.

I’ve long been an advocate of moving the wine writing ethics discussions off of wine blogs and onto other forums.  Of course, in order to make that argument, I need to dredge up the topic here on my own wine blog.  The irony…

Anyway, I’ve given the topic what for me constitutes some serious thought (at least a few seconds in-between sips), and I think the question of whether or not you’re ethical touches on the same things that make someone credible, especially when it comes to the blog-o-world:

  1. Transparency – Are you telling people what you’re doing, why you’re doing it, and how you’re going to do it?  In other words, are you hiding something, or are you telling the whole truth?
  2. Adherence – Are you actually doing what you said you’d be doing in #1?
  3. Consistency – Are you doing #1 and #2 the same way?  Do we know what to expect of your character?

Sure, there may be others, but if you don’t have those three nailed, then I suspect that blog readers would have you for lunch.  Quickly.

But… something doesn’t feel quite right about that list.  Something’s… missing.

Let’s demonstrate with an example.

On a recent episode of the fine radio program and podcast WineBizRadio.com, the episode’s special guest – wine PR and Fermentation blogger Tom Wark – discussed ethics with the show’s hosts.  Here’s a transcribed quote from the program:

“What’s unethical…when I call a magazine and say ‘I’ll give you $25,000 for a 93 point score,’ and they say ‘You’re on’ – that would be unethical. I’ve been in this business for 20 years and I’ve only bought coverage, uhm, once or twice. As a publicist my job is to get as much ‘right’ kind of exposure for my clients as I possibly can. If I thought I could buy a 95 point score from a reputable publication and be reasonably assured that no one would find out, I’d do it in a minute.” – Tom Wark

Well, Tom is certainly being transparent there (maybe a bit hypocritical, given his past statements on wine media ethics and the elder statesman role that he’s played in that space in the past, but definitely transparent).  Let’s say it actually happened, and he followed through with it and did it multiple times.  Would it be ethical?

No. F—king. Way.

Why?  Because the majority of people out there wouldn’t consider it ethical.  And there, for me, is the missing link.

That link is YOU.

In any media endeavor (at least, any on-line media endeavor, especially in the case of blogging), it’s ultimately the readers that determine if the source is credible, and those sources are unlikely to be perceived as credible if those same readers don’t also perceive them to be ethical.

Perception, as they say, is reality, but if you’re truly transparent then your readers’ perceptions will at least resemble reality, and then presumably you’ve got nothing much to worry about.

That’s how I’m going to operate anyway, so I sure hope I’m at least partially onto something.  It’s bound to be more fun than debating it endlessly, anyway!

Cheers!

(images: 1WineDude, current.com)

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

14 thoughts on “The Last Word on Wine Media Ethics3 min read”

  1. Arthur says:
    May 19, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Thanks for the kudos, Joe. And, wouldjabelieve, I was looking at the same illustration for my post?

    1. 1WineDude says:
      May 19, 2009 at 4:28 pm

      My pleasure – all well-deserved and I'm STILL talking about that post to people here in Germany this week!

      1. Arthur says:
        May 19, 2009 at 4:55 pm

        Very cool. I hope people will continue to pitch in to that discussion in a cam way and continue to expand the scope of the issue.

        Now who do I see about a trip to Italy?….. ;)

        1. Arthur says:
          May 19, 2009 at 5:51 pm

          make that: "in a calm way" ….

        2. Steve Heimoff says:
          May 21, 2009 at 10:42 pm

          Arthur, you had me worried with that cam thing.

  2. Todd Havens says:
    May 19, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    One of the upsides to the proliferation of the internet…the people have a collective say nowadays. A democratization, if you will, of public sentiment via one's social graph. (Okay, now I'm just trying to put multisyllabic words near each other in my sentences.)

    Point well taken, though, that evaluating insincerity on one end and unethical behavior on the other are the domain of the masses. I hope it does end up bringing more transparency and honesty to the interwebs.

    Also, I'm a big fan of paragraphs of single-word sentences to make one's point. "No. F—king. Way." LOL.

  3. lgking says:
    May 19, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    Funny thing…I did work for a couple of 'jokers' at an overly built and arrogant winery in the late '80's that did buy US$50,000.00 worth of advertising in a very famous publication, for the sole purpose for obtaining a better score. The guys were calling me almost daily from their various locations around the world to see…"if the new scores came yet…?" What a bunch of idiots…of course the 'new scores' never came!

  4. Remy says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:59 am

    Quick question. Why would anyone who is buying scores (even if it's only once or twice) be more ethical than the one who accepts being bought?

  5. Dylan says:
    May 20, 2009 at 8:22 am

    It's empowering, and sounds like a PSA, but it's true. The power is yours to decide if someone is credible or not, but that requires full-on transparency. Now, if Tom did do that, I would lose respect for him. I would stop reading his blog and I may even go as far to warn other people that he associates in dishonest activity–transparency allows me to do that. Of course, maybe it's not a big issue for me, then I continue reading and consider it a blip on the radar of his blogging career. In the end, it's my choice.

    1. 1WineDude says:
      May 20, 2009 at 3:09 pm

      I doubt sincerely that Tom would do that, of course. And I think part of the reason is that we know we'd all collectively cry fowl if it happened.

  6. 1WineDude says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Well, thanks – I'm a big fan of ending sentences with multisyllabic words so you're welcome here anytime! :)

  7. 1WineDude says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Ouch! Scary…

  8. 1WineDude says:
    May 20, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    They're not, at least, not in my view.

  9. 1WineDude says:
    May 28, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    A quick update, Penelope Trunk has a FANTASTIC post about the irrelevance of conflict of interests when blogging. Worth a read (and a re-read): http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict…

Comments are closed.

Dude’s New Books

Wine Taster's Guide Now Available!

“Bravo! Wine Taster's Guide is a perfect primer for both wine novices and learning enthusiasts." ―Evan Goldstein, Master Sommelier

Wine Taster's Journal Now Available!

"Wine Taster's Journal belongs in everyone's cellar… preferably wine-stained, dog-eared, and well-used.” ―Brian Freedman, wine/spirits/travel columnist

Get Some Wine

Popular Stuff

  • Wine Reviews: Weekly Mini Round-Up For December 21, 2020
    Wine Reviews: Weekly Mini Round-Up For December 21, 2020
  • Wine in the Time of Coronovirus, Part 22: Who's Down With BPC? (Bruno Paillard Champagne Tasting)
    Wine in the Time of Coronovirus, Part 22: Who's Down With BPC? (Bruno Paillard Champagne Tasting)
  • Wine Reviews: Weekly Mini Round-Up For December 28, 2020
    Wine Reviews: Weekly Mini Round-Up For December 28, 2020
  • The Ugly Truth, The Pretty Bubbles (Mailly Champagne Recent Releases)
    The Ugly Truth, The Pretty Bubbles (Mailly Champagne Recent Releases)
  • Minerals And Mustachios (Can Muscadet Be Aged For The Long Haul)?
    Minerals And Mustachios (Can Muscadet Be Aged For The Long Haul)?

About + Contact

Joe Roberts

Joe Roberts

Certified Specialist of Wine & WSET Advanced
Author, speaker, consultant, wine judge, & critic.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Find Stuff

Sign up, lushes!

Join 36,565 other subscribers

Fine Print

This site is licensed under Creative Commons.

Code of Ethics and Privacy Policies.

Play nice!

Get The Guide

Wine Tasters Guide Footer
#1 New Release in Amazon's Wine Tasting category
This site uses cookies. Duh. Cookie Policy
©2021 1 Wine Dude
Yo yo YO!

Wine Tasters Guide InstagramWell, hello there!

If you like what you’re reading (and want to like more of what you’re drinking), consider subscribing.

If you’re up for a more immersive wine learning experience, check out my books and other services.

Cheers!

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.