Don’t Yet Weep For Vinous Humanity (Wine.com’s Top 100 Wines 2015)

Vinted on December 10, 2015 binned in commentary, wine news

Hey, speaking of popularity contests

Wine.com 100 2015

image: wine.com

Another top-100 list was recently published, only in this case it’s (thankfully) not about wine blogs, but about wine sales: Wine.com’s annual Top 100 wines, chosen strictly by sales numbers (as they put it, “While many publications rank wines based on the opinions of their wine critics, we wanted our customers to be the judge, voting with their wallets…“).

I’m probably going to get flamed for typing this, but the top ten in the 2015 version of Wine.com’s 100 does NOT make me weep for our vinous huminty. Quite the contrary, actually; while it’s not going to polish the tastevins for most of the hipster sommeliers out there, I think that the 2015 Wine.com 100 speaks of general good tidings in terms of the How/What/How Much when it comes to wine consumers parting with their hard-earned cash…

Let’s take a closer look at the top 10, which is actually only 9 different wines if we exclude vintage:

  1. Meiomi Pinot Noir 2013
  2. Veuve Clicquot Brut Yellow Label
  3. Schug Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir 2013
  4. Robert Oatley Signature Chardonnay 2013
  5. Kaiken Ultra Malbec 2012
  6. Miraval Rose 2014
  7. Dona Paula Black Edition Red Blend 2012
  8. Columbia Crest H3 Cabernet Sauvignon 2013
  9. La Marca Prosecco
  10. Columbia Crest H3 Cabernet Sauvignon 2012

This is not a list over which we ought to despair.

From what I’ve been able to determine, the list has no real correlation to anything other than maybe favoring celebrity (Miraval), and brand mind-share (Clicquot, Dona Paula, La Marca, Meiomi).

They’re not the highest-rated wines; nor are they the most steeply-discounted wines. They’re the wines that people wanted to buy. Personally, I’ve had about half of this list not to review the wines, but just to drink them, when they were offered to me at parties/weddings/events/etc. And while I didn’t fall in love with them, they caused me no reason to botch or moan, that’s for sure.

The Wine.com 100’s top ten range from the consistent (Dona Paula, Veuve Clicquot, Columbia Crest – daaaaaang! two vintages in the top 10! – and Kaiken), to the tastily serviceable (Miraval, Schug, La Marca), to downright bargains (that entire line by Robert Oatley can be damned good for the price).

These aren’t bargain-bin releases, either: the average price is just over $20 (though the Clicquot is a bit of an outlier, inflating the average; without it,  the average is closer to $17 per bottle).

To me, this top ten list suggests that there are a lot of people buying wine online who are 1) willing to spend over $15 per bottle, 2) are moving beyond the “beginner” level in terms of buying entry-level wines, and therefore 3) might be ripe for the occasional up-sell into something maybe a bit more on the adventurous (or even just more expensive) side.

That’s mostly good news for the wine biz overall, folks.

Cheers!

7

 

 

    Comments

  • mike


    Meh

    • 1WineDude


      mike… enlightening… ;-)

  • Alder Yarrow


    Yes, but this only says something about the people who buy wine online, who are, by definition, NOT your average wine drinker (who usually drinks what they buy along with their groceries, or what is on the list at their local Applebees).

    • 1WineDude


      Alder – agreed (that’s the “how” part). Still interesting data, and I still think it’s positive progression. Also… Applebees has ***wine***?!???

  • James B


    I know loads of people who love Veuve Clicquot NV Yellow Label and I’ve never understood why. Always felt it to be a distinctly average Champagne in all regards. Certainly wouldn’t spend good money on it.

    However, Veuve’s Rose NV is so much better and that definitely deserves to be the more popular NV.

    • 1WineDude


      James – they have powerful marketing kung-fu.

      • James B


        Definitely helps when you’re part of LVMH!

        LVMH can even market and sell tat like Moet et Chandon Ice Imperial in prodigious quantities so their marketing skills are obviously immense! ;-) That stuff is absolutely f**king hateful – in fact, it’s the worst Champagne I’ve ever had. Cloyingly sweet gimmicky crap with no complexity.

        Although Chandon’s Rose Sparkling wine from Argentina is f**king awful as well but that too sells by the crate load. Never before have I drank a chilled sparkling wine with an excessively meaty aroma and I certainly don’t want to repeat the experience! Disgusting junk.

The Fine Print

This site is licensed under Creative Commons. Content may be used for non-commercial use only; no modifications allowed; attribution required in the form of a statement "originally published by 1WineDude" with a link back to the original posting.

Play nice! Code of Ethics and Privacy.

Contact: joe (at) 1winedude (dot) com

Google+

Labels

Vintage

Find

Sign up, lushes!

Enter your email address to subscribe and get all the good stuff via email.

Join 40,254 other subscribers

Gravityscan Badge